A while back I wrote about my memories of Reagan and Thatcher – The blunting of the blood. (You don’t have to read it as this piece is based on that one.) How some of us now have such fond memories of those leaders of the 80′s. Yes, our memories take on such lovely scenery when we think of the days of yesterday. The good old days. Those photos of their smiling faces. When we still had crap music and even crappier clothes. I am so not going to talk about the hairstyles… We can laugh at how silly we were. But we can never allow ourselves to look back at those days and think that they were okay. They weren’t.
But all this reflection and softening of views make me turn to the current leader of the free world. G.W. Bush. Sorry, President G.W. Bush.
Let me be clear about this piece. Very clear. I don’t want any misunderstanding. I don’t want to be accused of something that isn’t there. No misreading please. This is not a reflection on America or the American people. I love America and Americans – and everything this country and the people stand for. I will back them till death do us part. This is one hell of a country and more important than most Americans will know. I am proud of the fact that my daughters have to say the Pledge of Allegiance in school. But I won’t go into that today. Let’s just leave it at that. This is about President G.W. Bush and what he stands for and what he has done. I respect the office of the President of the United States and what it stands for – but I don’t respect President Bush and what he stands for. This is about never forgetting and never forgiving. This is about the memories we will have when we look back at the time President G.W. Bush ruled the free world.
__________________________
I am shocked, or rather surprised, by a few people close to me who mentioned that he looks like such a good dad. He looks like a good guy. Maybe a bit stupid, but a good guy you know.
No I don’t.
I was shocked by my first immediate reaction when the person said that they hated what he has done but that he seems like such a good dad and that it looks like he really loves his wife. My reaction?
…
“Well, Hitler loved Eva Braun.”
I did regret saying it but it was an immediate reaction. Like the one second rule in self defense. I didn’t think about it – it just popped out.
I regret saying it because I did not mean in any way that Bush is like Hitler. Not in any way. What I meant was that loving someone does not mean I have to have any compassion for you. Or that I should in any way view your actions as okay. It’s not.
You loved someone. So what? There are a shit load of people out there you didn’t love.
You had good intentions? Well… We know about that road and good intentions…
You are better than Hitler. So what? It’s not really a yardstick to measure anyone now is it? I can only judge you on your own actions. And for that reason there will be no forgetting. No forgiving. No favorable views. No good memories. No blunting of the blood.
I can’t look at him and think that somehow there is a good man hidden inside. I can’t read minds. I can’t see his soul. I can only judge by the actions I see. And the bodies in the street.
I can’t wipe away the bad that happened yesterday. The pain doesn’t actually feel less important. Time does not heal the dead left behind. I can’t blunt the memories of those who suffered.
Can we look at Bush and think that he was a good guy who loved his country and not remember the warmongering? I don’t doubt or question his love for his country. A great country. It is worth loving. And it is worth defending. But the love for his country does not make him a good guy. It doesn’t change the lies of WMD’s. It doesn’t change the lies of victory never achieved in his time. The empty promises of war and vengeance.
Can we look at Bush and think that love ruled his life before anything else? Even though he never spoke out against terrorists of human rights in Saudi Arabia. He didn’t fund them. But he never spoke out against them. You are judged by the company you keep. And they weren’t nice people. And he wasn’t a nice guy. Sitting on a horse for the cameras or chopping wood for the reporters are called acting. Not real life. How many people died because of his policies? How much blood must he have on his hands before you look at the man and say he was fundamentally flawed? And remind yourself never to forget that this is the man who ruled and not the guy we want to remember as the one who loved.
Can we remember Bush as the President who amused us with his silly words and stupid remarks? Can we laugh at how much fodder he gave the late night shows and comedians? No we can’t. We can’t forget how he slowly but surely strangled the last line in Pledge of Allegiance. “…liberty and justice for all.” How the freedoms and rights and liberties and justice were slowly eroded under his watch. The Patriot Act was sold as the car with the latest safety measures and gadgets. And all we got was a second-hand salesman selling us a car that guzzled gas and made us more addicted to foreign oil. Guantanamo Bay was the victim of the hit-and-run accident that involved that car.
And I won’t forgive or forget his favorite side-kick either. Tony Blair… How can we forget his wishy-washy attitude about the war that was against the popular wishes of his own people. Now hiding behind his religious beliefs as if God send him to go into a senseless war. His willingness to follow Bush to the graves of the innocent. Like Thatcher and Reagan. So was Blair and Bush. Different sides of the same coin. He was bad. They are bad. Bad. Bad. Bad.
I am sorry. I can’t look at Bush and his stupid smile and feel any warmth. I can’t see his love for those close to him. All I see is the people dying in the streets and the erosion of rights. And him not speaking out against the terrorists of human rights. People dying senselessly. Blood on his hands. No forgiveness. No love. Nothing.
I am sorry. I can’t. I can’t… I can’t forgive if the person doesn’t ask for forgiveness. I can’t look at him and see a “good guy”. I can’t. I see him and I see the look of Reagan and Thatcher in the 80′s. He has given leadership a bad name. Because he did bad things. Blood on his hands. No love. No forgiveness. No good memories. Nothing.
I see his fake smile and teary eyes when he realizes his time in charge is over. And then I see his deeds. The blood on the streets. Rights ripped to pieces. Honor gone to shit. Ideals flushed down the toilet. I see him selling me shit but calling it sweets. You didn’t fool me then. And my memories won’t fool me now.
I won’t let time fade my memories. I won’t. No blunting of the blood. You ask for forgiveness and I will forgive. But not an inch until then. I won’t do it. I will honor the dead of yesterday. And I will honor the dead of today. I will honor them by not forgetting them. And not forgiving you.
You should have known better. You should have known better. You ruled the free world. It came with a responsibility. An oath to walk the straight and narrow. A promise to be the shining light in our dark world. And you snuffed it out like it was a single candle in a storm. Without a blink. Without regret. Without a moment given to the dead lying in your path. Without a moment of asking forgiveness. Because you didn’t care. You only cared about yourself. You were selfish and self absorbed.
Wash your hands and turn your back. That’s what you will do. Like they did then and you will do now. I don’t feel sorry for you. I don’t think you were a nice guy. I have nothing for you. You are empty. Meaningless to humanity. You have meaning only in the blood you left behind in the streets. The rights lying in the gutters of life. And the blood etched in our memories.
I don’t give a damn about what the terrorist and the fucked up coward in the cave did. I don’t give a damn about what Saddam did. I don’t give a damn about what the Taliban did. They deserve death beyond comprehension. But I don’t care about their deeds. I expected them to be evil. It was in their bones. In their blood. They were in my face. They were bad. And we knew it. We know it. We heard their hatred and saw their murdering ways. Like Hitler they were.
But you. You were supposed to be the promise keeper. The good one. The fair one. The just one. The one who would fight for us. Be on our side. On the side of the innocent. The bystanders. And you spat on us and those who suffered. And gave us a fake cowboy smile and a gun to our heads.
I won’t let my memories be blunted by the troubles of today. Today is today. Yesterday was yesterday. You were bad yesterday. And you remain bad today. I won’t let them say “he was really a good guy who loved his family”. I won’t let them think of you as being out of depth and maybe a little stupid. I won’t let you get away with it. I won’t. You weren’t stupid. Your mistakes were made by you. Knowingly. I won’t forget. Not while the blood is still on your hands. Not while the rights and freedoms and liberties and justice are lying shattered at your feet. Not while I still have my memories of the dead. Not while you forgot to ask for forgiveness.
No blunting. You let us down. You have blood on your hands. You. Are. No. Great. Leader.
No blunting.
Never forget. Never forgive. Don’t let it fade.
No blunting. Of the blood.


December 3, 2008 at 7:45 am
Hindsight is going to be quite interesting on this one.
“Blunting of the blood” cool phrase.
You know, when Bush first ran for president, his platform wasn’t to go kick terrorist ass. He was put in a situation by something that at the time none of us could fathom. Today it is with us daily. It has become commonplace.
It easy to sit on the side line and bad mouth something you don’t understand but even being able to look back, what would you have done differently? We all see the “blood” but that is like looking at the glass half empty.
I could get into a lot of things to rebut what you think here but what would be more interesting is how you come to the conclusions you do. Why are you so negative when you have gotten what you want? You put yourself into Bush’s shoes and know what he is thinking. How do you do that?
What I see is a tired guy waiting for his time to end. We could have a Chavez, a guy trying to weasel his way around his term limit, as our power grazed leader. We don’t, we have a beaten man leaving. He’s even admitted to being the reason his party lost. I’m pretty sure their candidate selection was as much to blame.
The new guy has a tough roe to hoe and I sure hope his trial by fire is not as hot as Bushes was, or he’ll be treading water for the next 4 years too. And I mean like trading water during a hurricane. NOT and easy task.
December 3, 2008 at 8:02 am
@skuttlefish – What would I have done differently? One big thing I would have done differently is to really go with an alliance willing to take on the terrorists. He had all the support he could imagine after 9/11. Every major country backed him. We all backed him going into Afghanistan. No problem there. But then he divided the world at a time when we needed unity. He divided us because of Iraq. Big mistake and he must live with that. He made us weaker because he divided us. Instead of standing together and standing strong against terrorism, he weakened us by saying “it is my way or no way”. Unity against terrorism would have been more succesful in dealing with what we face. But we are not in a better position to fight those against liberty, freedom and justice for all. That’s why I won’t give him an inch. He had the support but fucked it up by going into something that only diverted attention from the real problem. And now we have to live with it and try and clean his mess.
Remember that France was 100% behind the US after 9/11. In fact, their President was the first global leader to fly over here after 9/11 to show support. But when they turned against the invasion of Iraq? All of a sudden it was “freedom fries”.
And Guantanamo Bay? America is and should be better than that. There was no reason to open that up. But he did. And all he got was more rights limited. And the Patriot Act? Needed? Not sure because we haven’t seen too many people charged with anything because of that.
Look at the UK. They didn’t limit rights the way the US has since 9/11. But they have managed to find more people guilty of terrorism than the US.
I wasn’t anti-Bush when he won the first election. I was pro-Bush after 9/11. And then I turned anti-Bush when he started limiting rights and taking his eyes off the real fight against terrorism. That’s the blood on his hands. We could have been further in the fight against terrorism if the focus was on terrorism and not Iraq. It was a dividing factor when we needed unity. And that blood, American and Iraqi, is on his hands.
I don’t care much for Chavez. I didn’t expect much from him. But I hold the American President to a higher standard. Unfair? Maybe. But he/she is who I look up to for leadership in a dark world and Bush didn’t give it to me. He threw it back in my face. That’s his failure. For not uniting us but dividing us when the alternative would have been easier.
December 3, 2008 at 10:45 am
AA – powerful post today and I couldn’t agree more. Wonderful hit and run analogy with Gitmo.
So much violation, so much blood. It makes me so angry. Recently I stood at my father’s grave side in a military cemetery in Florida. So many fallen men and women in these wars we are waging now. I sobbed for all this stolen life, stolen by the arrogance of the people in this Administration and its leader G.W. Bush. Lives given with honor but taken by thieves. My family has worn a uniform for generations, proud to protect the liberties on both sides of the pond – but I find no honor in our Commander in Chief. I pray he realizes the blood on his hands and I hope the ghosts of these stolen souls haunt him.
I also hope America has finally awoke from the cowed fears of life since 9/11. It is time to reclaim our Constitution Rights surrendered under the guise of safety. As Ben Franklin said: Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Just over 48 days remain now… time to gather our shreds of freedom and find our collective sewing kits and get busy mending.
December 3, 2008 at 11:27 am
I know you wont like this much but I am one of those that actually support what he has done. Iraq is a mess no doubt, but there were many other countries that agreed on the wmd issue, it’s not all on President Bush.
I may be blinded by my own hatred and lust for vengeance (my best friend died on 9/11) , but I cannot help but think he is doing what is necessary
December 3, 2008 at 11:31 am
Right after 9/11 everyone was behind the US. Not sure what you mean. Coming up with a plan and executing it? You’ve lost me. Was the plan flawed? Did the planners fail to look at the history books?
As I asked, what should have been done? How did the involvement in Iraq divide us? Freedom Fries? Something terrible happened on US soil to people from all over the world. A chord was struck and EVERYONE felt the vulnerability. Action was taken. A lot of people were against that action. For the last 7 years, we have felt a little safer as the war has remained in Iraq and Afghanistan but we still are looking over our shoulders. Do you think Franklin could have envisioned that? Hell the Brits were still marching to battle in ranks back then. The patriots had to show them guerilla tactics.
As far as stolen life and feeling bad for that, stand in any military graveyard and you’ll have that feeling, even if it’s an enemy graveyard. But what are the alternatives?
Show me a precedence for Guantanamo Bay. WWII involved enemy combatants being put in camps to work out the war. What do you do with terrorists that are unconventional bad guys? Guys that are willing to die for their cause as a REWARD? Give them due process??? A court appointed lawyer to get them off so that they can turn around and do it again?
Lots of feel good stuff. Just like the idea of Peace. The moral ideals.
Obama is going to have to make the same decisions that Bush, Clinton and every other president has had to make. I just hope that he makes the right ones.
December 3, 2008 at 11:42 am
You know, books are going to be written about why Bush’s administration made mistakes or succeeded. Whole area’s of study are going to be designated to figure out the reasons things did or didn’t work. Scholars and strategists are going to be arguing how it all was a failure or how it all was a success. Points will be made one way or another.
In the end who’s going to decide what was right or wrong? or is it all just going to be a matter of opinion?
December 3, 2008 at 1:23 pm
@Skuttlefish – I have to agree with AA. A lot of your arguments have already been debunked – such as the “enemy combatants” that are locked up in Guantanamo. Just coz they’re in Guantanamo doesn’t mean they’re terrorists ! Else for sure they would have been given reasonable trials in reasonable time. It was an excuse to keep the general American public believing in the Bush war of choice in Iraq. Heck, even bin Laden’s driver has been proven innocent…of terrorism.
@Saffer – again, not a lot of countries agreed on the WMD assertions ! Come guy, say you support what Bush did, but giving reasons like that !! Bush kicked the UN inspectors out of Iraq as fast as he could so they wouldn’t prove his intelligence wrong on the WMDs…and he could go ahead with his war ! What was the rush ?
Action was taken in the wrong direction that has caused a lot of pain, suffering and death to a people that had done nothing to the USA. Instead the real culprits whom everyone, including IRAN, wanted caught and brought to justice and we ended up with years of torture of innocents, a wonderful recruitment tool for the terrorists and who knows what kind of future for our children. Obama had better stop being belligerent and a little softer if he wants to change all that.
you go AA.
December 3, 2008 at 1:45 pm
Montel, the US was not the only country that believed Iraq had WMD’s, the security agencies from many others thought the same. No that does not excuse the invasion, but its not all Bush’s fault. He believed the intelligence he had, many other people did to.
“The intelligence which the president shared with us was in line with what we saw in the White House…”
- Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, 2003
“We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.”
– Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
“Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.”
– Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
“In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members … It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.”
– Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
“Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime … He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation … And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction … So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real…”
– Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
In 1998, the US was certain that Saddam Hussein was acquiring and developing WMD, and that he posed a credible threat. President Clinton said it. His party said it. The opposition party agreed. The press said it. England said it. Israel said it. France said it. China and Russia said it. EVERYONE said it. EVERYONE accepted it. These were the intelligence reports, and everyone found them believable. Why was the intelligence wrong? Where did the false intelligence come from? That is what needs to be answered.
Should Bush have held off? Sure with hindsight that is easy to answer. Did he make the right decision based on the intelligence he had at the time? I think so. I might be naive, or blinded by lust for revenge as I said, but I do not think he is a warmonger, not at all.
President Bush has the most stressful job in the world, and I don’t envy President-elect Obama one iota. He has a very difficult 8 years ahead of him (I do think he will have 2 terms).
December 3, 2008 at 3:25 pm
Nothing quite like quotes from the Donkey’s mouths.
Unfortunately, we’ve negotiated with North Korea to put a purported stop to their program and we’re not anywhere near likely to attack Iraq over their assumed weapons program. Lybia has also renounced it’s Nuclear program.
Why the haste?
It is my understanding that Hussien’s bravado was largely a smoke screen to keep the Iranians at bay.
It ended up being his undoing.
December 3, 2008 at 3:36 pm
Hi Saffer
I don’t disagree that in 1998 he probably did have WMD-making capabilities – and Clinton was bombing Iraq anyway. But for sure by 2002 when the intel was being assembled Saddam was done with all that. Most of the individuals you quote probably didn’t even read or have access to the raw intel and were going by what was being leaked/said by the GWB administration and “remembering” 1998. Even till today, Hillary hasn’t apologised for her vote “knowing NOW what she didn’t know THEN”. The main thing is, though, that the administration wanted a war with Iraq and they used something that the nation at large would rally round – some PNAC guy said that (Perle, Wolfowitz, etc, can’t remember which one)…and WMD was it. Not that Saddam was a monster – which he was – or that he was a dictator or some other rationale that would make Congress and the people say “hold on” we can’t just invade Iraq coz Saddam’s a jerk. So knowing that his intel we iffy and with Cheney pulling the strings, Bush went to the wrong war !! And, and, the inspectors were back in Iraq in 2002. And were NOT allowed to finish their mission – and they had found nothing ! So there was no rush to go to war and YES Bush should have held off and let the inspectors finish…unless he knew that things were not as he was saying they were as regards WMD. Sorry for the acronyms – I am trying to keep this short !!
All the intelligence failures have already been exposed. The fake notes and lies about Saddam’s government being in contact with Al Qaeda, etc…Valerie Plame, Wilson – all those games that were played out against opponents of the war.
Bottom line – Bush should have held back and let the proof one way or the other come out. He didn’t.
I am glad to see you’re an optimist on Obama doing 2 terms ! It’s not so much how many terms he has as how effective he is in getting things right again.
Peace !
December 3, 2008 at 3:40 pm
woops my brain slipped. That should have been Iran instead of Iraq
December 3, 2008 at 3:57 pm
he was jus a man
December 3, 2008 at 4:39 pm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2008/dec/02/george-bush-iraq-wmd
Peace and good night !
December 6, 2008 at 6:53 am
The Iraq thing was a huge mistake. I’m ambivalent towards the Bush presidency now because of PEPFAR. It’s providing antiretroviral therapy at no cost to patients in African countries. That program has saved a lot of lives and still continues to do so.
December 12, 2008 at 3:47 pm
Nail meet Hammer. I appreciate your post, AA. Damn Good!
I have a lot of faith that our new president will do everything in his power to drive us away from the edge of this precipice, but the Powers That Be will be fighting him every step of the way.
That’s where we come in. Only by using our medium (the Net), our gifts, our guile and dedication will we overcome those who would let this country die for their 30 pieces of silver.
The time for action is now. Not tomorrow, not after the holidays, not on Jan. 20th. An ambulance can’t wait for traffic to clear before it goes on a life-saving ride. Our country may not survive the next 38 days without our actions.